American Power Act is Hidden Tax on Transportation, ATA Says

May 13, 2010
The American Trucking Associations (ATA) opposes the American Power Act, the climate change bill introduced May 12 by Sen. John Kerry and Sen. Joe Lieberman, ATA President and CEO Bill Graves said

The American Trucking Associations (ATA) opposes the American Power Act, the climate change bill introduced May 12 by Sen. John Kerry and Sen. Joe Lieberman, ATA President and CEO Bill Graves said.

He said the bill will raise the cost of gasoline and diesel fuel without significantly reducing the output of carbon dioxide by the trucking industry, which is a non-discretionary user of diesel fuel.

The Senate bill would require refiners to purchase billions of dollars worth of carbon allowances that correspond to the carbon footprint of the fuels they sell. The refiners will then pass this cost on to consumers in the form of higher fuel prices. As such, the Senate bill operates as a hidden multi-billion-dollar tax.

“While others might object to our characterization, the climate bill clearly imposes a tax on transportation fuels and reallocates revenue from that tax for non-transportation purposes,” Graves said. “Only a small portion of the tax would go to the Highway Trust Fund for much-needed improvements and repairs to our nation’s highway infrastructure.

“The bill will markedly increase the cost of fuel, but the trucking industry is not a ‘discretionary’ user of fuel. While the trucking industry has reduced its fuel consumption and carbon output through the EPA SmartWay Transport Partnership Program and other efforts, the bulk of trucking companies’ fuel use is for their economically vital role of distributing freight whenever and wherever manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers and consumers demand.”

In addition, forthcoming federal regulations required under existing law will mandate vehicle modifications that, while increasing the cost of trucks, will improve fuel efficiency and further reduce carbon emissions.

“The economically essential nature of trucking means that unless you shrink the economy and reduce the amount of freight transported, which would have disastrous results, you are not going to curb carbon output by trucking under this bill,” Graves said.

In 2008 the ATA proposed ways to reduce carbon emissions: reducing speed limits, governing truck speeds, reducing idling, increasing fuel efficiency, reducing highway congestion, allowing more productive truck combinations and creating national fuel economy standards for trucks.

The ATA supports dedicating transportation tax revenue to the Highway Trust Fund in order to repair bridges and highways and eliminate congestion points, which would further reduce fuel consumption and carbon emissions.

“Part of our concern is that with this cap and tax bill, trucking companies are being asked to pay for the reduction of carbon output three times over,” President and CEO Graves said. “The first payment will take the form of equipment cost increases for large truck fuel efficiency regulations referred to earlier. The second will be an increase in excise fees we pay into the Highway Trust Fund as the cost of trucks and tires rise under this legislation. And the third will be the enormous hidden fuel taxes that result from the Kerry-Lieberman bill.”

The bill offers incentives to trucking companies for converting from diesel trucks to natural gas trucks. While ATA supports development of natural gas and other alternative fuels, these incentives will be attractive to only a small number of companies with dedicated, short-distance operations. ATA also notes that these incentives are insufficient to ensure the build-out of a competitive natural gas refueling infrastructure.